Author Erika Mailman |
Before There was Crime Scene
Tape
In
1892, the small mill town of Fall River, Massachusetts, was shaken to its core
by the hatchet murders of a prominent citizen, Andrew Borden, and his wife
Abby. His daughter (Abby's stepdaughter) Lizzie Borden was accused of the
murders and stood trial a year later. She was acquitted, but the intervening
century and a quarter have seen many people convinced of her guilt.
If she
was guilty, one of the things that helped her mightily was the way the crime
scene was treated. No yellow tape protected the integrity of the scene. A
photographer confronted with the body of Mrs. Borden, half hidden by the bed
she crawled under to escape the hatchet, simply pulled her out and rearranged
her to get a full-body image. No images were taken of the exact position in
which she lay.
Curious
neighbors felt free to walk through the home and view the corpses. Lizzie, her
sister, her uncle, and a friend spent the next few nights in the home where
they could have easily tampered with evidence or hidden a weapon better. (The
bodies rested in the dining room at least one night until taken away). Officers
were posted outside, but no one kept a firm eye on Lizzie. Several days after
the murders, she burned one of her dresses in the kitchen stove. Whether
covered in blood or not, the dress was part of an active crime scene.
In
the trial transcripts, we find proof of what a circus the crime scene was. Witness
Thomas Barlow testified that he and a friend went to the Borden house as soon
as they'd heard about the murders. They tried to get inside, but weren't
allowed in. So instead, they went to the backyard barn. Lizzie claimed the barn
loft as part of her alibi, so this again was an active part of the scene that
was not protected as it should have been.
Here's
Barlow:
"Went
into the barn and right up to the hayloft. Looked out the west window, then
looked in under the hay, and then came downstairs and went out (he and his
friend were looking for the murderer!)...Went to the south side of the house;
tried to look in window. There were several people looking in the
windows."
Barlow
said he stayed at the house, milling around the yard, until dinnertime. He went
home to eat and returned to the Borden house, where he stood in the street
until midnight.
He
and his friend were only boys, which perhaps explains why they couldn't gain
admittance to the house, unlike hundreds of others who gamely tromped through
the house. The Borden home is very close to the street, so undoubtedly Lizzie
and other family members were well aware of the hooting townspeople clustered
on the street watching and waiting for anything worth seeing.
There
are so many ways in which the police department didn't effectively secure the
crime scene. An officer admitted that the attic was not searched. Other than
maid Bridget Sullivan's bedroom and another chamber, the attic was basically a
wide open space filled with boxes and trunks—the perfect place to hide a
weapon. Nor was the kitchen searched, nor the cupboard from which Lizzie
plucked the dress she burned. It seems the "female" or
"servant" areas were not considered worthy of examination.
A
spool of yellow tape could've gone a long way for this case.
Erika
Mailman is the author of The Murderer's Maid: A Lizzie Borden Novel, as well as
several other historical novels. Visit www.erikamailman.com.
The Borden story never gets old to me.
ReplyDeletesherry @ fundinmental
Me either! It is still sooooo fascinating!
DeleteMe either! And it's really fun to see so many different interpretations of the same material. :)
ReplyDeleteOh yeah! So many places that weren't searched or secured. Great post!
ReplyDeleteIt's amazing how much has changed with regard to criminal scene investigation!
DeleteFascinating post, thank you Erika and Meg! And thanks Meg for hosting the Blog Tour!
ReplyDeleteAmy
HF Virtual Book Tours